Jump to content

Ordered today a Nautilus Reserve


shoeguy

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Cosmos36 said:

As for 2.0 vs 2.7 performance & fuel mileage comparisons, Lincoln has confirmed that although the transmissions mated to both engines have the same number of gears, each engine has a unique tranny version with different gear ratios and "...other mechanical changes."

 

 

They are both 8-speeds, but are actually different transmissions with different origins. See for instance: https://www.autonews.com/article/20180423/OEM01/180429934/no-thanks-ford-says-to-9-speed-offered-by-gm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

300A                     =             Nautilus Reserve

J6L                        =             Front Wheel Drive

99P/44F               =             Twin Turbocharges 2.7 V6

87D                       =             Driver Assistance Package

53U                       =             Ultimate Package

68R                       =             Satin Roof Side Rails without Crossbars

91Q                       =             Ultra Comfort (22 Way) Seating with Active Motion Power Thigh Support

R3                         =             Burgundy Velvet Metallic Tinted Clearcoat Paint

BD                         =             Express Ash Swirl – Open pore

153                       =             Front License Bracket

43C                       =             Cargo Accessories and Mat Package

51U                       =             Cargo Utility Package

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think MKXMark raises a good point. This is from a C&D review of the MKX with the 2.7 and FWD, but it should apply to the Nautilus as well:

 

"One might also expect that, by carrying nearly 300 pounds less than the all-wheel-drive model, the front-drive 2.7 turbo model might serve up quicker zero-to-60-mph acceleration times. (Or at least matching ones.) Nope. The best we could muster with the front-driver was a lackluster 6.9 seconds, 0.9 second behind the all-wheel-drive MKX and 1.3 seconds behind the Ford Edge Sport, which is powered by a detuned version of the same engine with 315 horsepower and 350 lb-ft of torque.

What gives? Low-speed traction. At anything beyond half throttle, the MKX just can’t get a grip. The comfort-oriented suspension allows serious rear-axle squat under acceleration, pitching the nose up and unloading the front wheels, resulting in fruitless wheelspin. If there are pavement irregularities or a whiff of steering input when the power comes in, the driver needs both hands on the wheel to keep pointed straight. Stability control actually seems to worsen this effect, applying the brake to one front wheel, then the other, generating a seesaw response. We’re talking about steering-wheel-yanking torque steer like you haven’t seen since a 1980s Saab Turbo. Much of the 2.7T’s extra power goes to waste when it can’t route excess torque to the rear wheels. We tested during dry conditions in California and can’t imagine how rambunctious it might be in the wet or in snow."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Torque steer has always been an issue with front drive cars . I remember the way my Explorer was . I had a 2011 front wheel drive Limited. The steering wheel would turn completely out of your hand. That was the last FWD car I have ever owned. My wifes 2017 Infiniti Q50 has the twin turbo 3.0 and all wheel drive. That car snaps you as well. Mind you , she has no clue as to how much torque that car has. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, shoeguy said:

 That car snaps you as well. Mind you , she has no clue as to how much torque that car has. 

 

Does she think that if you go past half throttle the engine will blow up (like mine)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, akirby said:

 

Does she think that if you go past half throttle the engine will blow up (like mine)?

The only time the car ever accelerates to any degree is when I drive it on the highway if we take it somewhere. She drives like a little old lady. 

She had a 2015 Q50 and when her lease was up it had 24,000 Kilometers. Her 2018 she got mid August it has 2,900 as of yesterday. When ever I drive she says that I am gunning it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Torque steer was why I bought an AWD, even though I live in LA. AWD Nautiluses are rare in LA, with most dealers having zero to one on their lots.  Conversely, you can find AWD Edges (probably because its a high volume vehicle and there are a large number on dealer lots).  


Rick is a knowledgeable guy and I'm sure he made an informed choice.  However,  if I lease another one, it will be AWD again. The Nautilus feels like a different vehicle to me with FWD.  I'd even argue that the Ford vehicles with the 2.0 4 cyl and FWD suffer from torque steer. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, shoeguy said:

The only time the car ever accelerates to any degree is when I drive it on the highway if we take it somewhere. She drives like a little old lady. 

She had a 2015 Q50 and when her lease was up it had 24,000 Kilometers. Her 2018 she got mid August it has 2,900 as of yesterday. When ever I drive she says that I am gunning it.  

 

I feel your pain.  Probably thinks if you take a 45 mph corner at 55 mph (and could probably take it at 65 and be perfectly safe) that you're about to fly off the road and crash.  Drives me crazy.   I don't care if she drives like that but stop telling me to drive that way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally. Some good new on my soon to be built Blue Diamond Nautilus Reserve. 

Build date of March 23. Ship Date March 26. Landing at the dealer April 1. 

I laugh when my contact at the dealer said 5 days transport for  45 minute drive from the factory. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I drive a FWD MKZ 2.0, and while the power is adequate torque steer isn't really an issue. When I drove a service loaner MKC with the same motor I thought it was ridiculous, you had to fight it under full throttle. I'll be curious to see how a FWD Nautilus 2.7 is.

 

The MKX is the wife's AWD 3.7 but I always drive when it's the two of us. She's used to my "sporting" driving style and I enjoy engaging sport mode in the twisties. At 20K miles the Michelins on my MKZ are showing a lot of wear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/5/2019 at 11:11 AM, NautiJeff said:

Thanks.  I've been dealing with my salesman for over 20 years so I kinda don't want to insult him as he's always been fantastic in his customer service.  I ordered a Reserve in Magnetic with Slate interior and 21" wheels so it's kind of a unique combination that they likely wouldn't order for dealer stock.  Frankly, I'm not surprised as I've ordered other Lincolns in the past where this has happened.  If by chance there was some mix-up, I can always make the last payment on the MKC and keep it another month, so I'm not too concerned.  

Stopped by the dealer to check it out and confirmed it's mine. Very pleased with Magnetic paint and Slate interior as well as the 21" wheels.

Still finding it odd that it was delivered a month before its originally scheduled build date and was such a quick turnaround from the January 7 order date. I'm set to take delivery a week from today on the 21st when my existing lease expires. 

Sorry I only snapped a couple pics but it was parked between two other vehicles. 

IMG_20190308_1410515.jpg

IMG_20190308_1407511.jpg

Edited by NautiJeff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2019 at 2:31 PM, thisguy159 said:

It will be 50 50 or slightly in favor of the 2.0 which is enough for most ppl. 

I tend to agree, but everyone's circumstances are different.  Our Nautilus will be my wife's daily driver and she wouldn't feel the benefit of the 2.7 very often the way she drives, so we opted for the 2.0.  My daily driver is an Explorer Sport so I have the 3.5L turbo to satisfy my need for performance.  If the Nautilus were my daily driver I would've more strongly considered the 2.7 after crunching the numbers to see how much it would increase my lease payments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...